Government of Gujarat3 vs MANISHBHAI SON OF VIMALBHAI THAKAR Advocate - S B VORIYA — 8807/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM020128812024

Filing Number

8807/2024

Filing Date

03-Sep-2024

Registration No

8807/2024

Registration Date

03-Sep-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

27-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202001240038

Police Station

MAHILA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),54
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat3

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISHBHAI SON OF VIMALBHAI THAKAR Advocate - S B VORIYA

  2. 2.VIMALBHAI SON OF CHANDUBHAI HARISHANKAR THAKAR

  3. 3.MINAXIBEN WIFE OF VIMALBHAI CHANDUBHAI THAKAR

  4. 4.JATINBHAI SON OF VIMALBHAI CHANDUBHAI THAKAR

  5. 5.PAYALBEN WIFE OF ROHITBHAI KISHANBHAI VYAS

  6. 6.ROHITBHAI SON OF KISHANBHAI HARILAL VYAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 8807/2024 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar Decision Date: May 27, 2026 Key Ruling: All six accused persons were acquitted of all charges under IPC 2023 Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 54, and Dowry Prohibition Act Section 4. Critical Finding: The court found that while the complainant (bride) alleged mistreatment and harassment by her husband's family during married life, her testimony contained significant inconsistencies between her formal complaint and courtroom statements. Major incidents described in testimony (injuries, alleged attempted poisoning, physical abuse) were not documented in the original FIR and were only revealed during examination, undermining their credibility. The court applied the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused when two possible interpretations exist. Finding insufficient reliable evidence of any cognizable offense, the court acquitted all defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 25-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 21-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 17-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 18-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 03-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 03-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8807/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 8807/2024 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar Decision Date: May 27, 2026 Key Ruling: All six accused persons were acquitted of all charges under IPC 2023 Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 54, and Dowry Prohibition Act Section 4. Critical Finding: The court found that while the complainant (bride) alleged mistreatment and harassment by her husband's family during married life, her testimony contained significant inconsistencies between her formal complaint and courtroom statements. Major incidents described in testimony (injuries, alleged attempted poisoning, physical abuse) were not documented in the original FIR and were only revealed during examination, undermining their credibility. The court applied the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused when two possible interpretations exist. Finding insufficient reliable evidence of any cognizable offense, the court acquitted all defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case