DINESHBHAI VALJIBHAI KHANIYA vs RAVI MAKWANA — 867/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 97. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJJM020050662026

Filing Number

867/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

867/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 97

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI VALJIBHAI KHANIYA

    Adv. H G CHAVDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVI MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: CR.M.A No. 867/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's (Dineshbhai Valjibhai Khaniya) petition seeking a habeas corpus warrant under IPC Section 100 to recover his wife from respondent Ravi Makwana's custody. The court found that the wife had voluntarily left the matrimonial home of her own free will and was willingly residing with the respondent, with no evidence of wrongful confinement or unlawful restraint. Since a wife's independent choice to remain with another person does not constitute wrongful confinement justifying court intervention under Section 100 IPC, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-May-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 867/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.M.A No. 867/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's (Dineshbhai Valjibhai Khaniya) petition seeking a habeas corpus warrant under IPC Section 100 to recover his wife from respondent Ravi Makwana's custody. The court found that the wife had voluntarily left the matrimonial home of her own free will and was willingly residing with the respondent, with no evidence of wrongful confinement or unlawful restraint. Since a wife's independent choice to remain with another person does not constitute wrongful confinement justifying court intervention under Section 100 IPC, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case