RAJDEEPSINH JAYENDRASINH JADEJA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 824/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 437. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJM020049212026
Filing Number
824/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
824/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202057260123
Police Station
SIKKA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJDEEPSINH JAYENDRASINH JADEJA
Adv. A H JOSHI
-
2.DASHRATHSINH JAYENDRASINH JADEJA
-
3.BHISHAMRAJSINH HATHISINH URFE HAKUBHA JADEJA
-
4.KULDEEPSINH RANJITSINH JADEJA
-
5.LAXMANSINH HATHISINH URFE HAKUBHA JADEJA
-
6.DIVYRAJSINH VIKRAMSINH JADEJA
-
7.VIKRAMSINH MERUBHA JADEJA
-
8.SAHDEVSINH RAJENDRASINH JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
The court rejected the bail applications of accused persons 1-3 (Rajdeepsinh, Dashrathsinh, and Bhishamrajsinh Jadeja), finding that serious charges under IPC sections 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 351, 352, and GP Act section 135(1) constitute prima facie cases warranting life imprisonment. The court noted the FIR detailed violent attacks using swords and iron pipes causing three fractures to the complainant, with the accused's role clearly documented in medical records and witness statements. The bail plea was dismissed as the accused failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstance under CrPC 480 that would warrant release pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 824/2026
The court rejected the bail applications of accused persons 1-3 (Rajdeepsinh, Dashrathsinh, and Bhishamrajsinh Jadeja), finding that serious charges under IPC sections 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 351, 352, and GP Act section 135(1) constitute prima facie cases warranting life imprisonment. The court noted the FIR detailed violent attacks using swords and iron pipes causing three fractures to the complainant, with the accused's role clearly documented in medical records and witness statements. The bail plea was dismissed as the accused failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstance under CrPC 480 that would warrant release pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts