JADEJA AJAYSINH RANJITSINH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 715/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJM020041592026
Filing Number
715/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
715/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202057260127
Police Station
SIKKA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JADEJA AJAYSINH RANJITSINH
Adv. A M GHORI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CR.M.A No. 715-2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking return of a seized mobile phone (Vivo V-27 model) during pendency of the case. Key Reasoning: Although the petitioner proved ownership through purchase bill and the seized phone matched his device, the court found the case involves liquor seizure exceeding 20 liters under the Prohibition Act. Per mandatory provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition (Liquor Samples) Rules 2019, contraband items in cases involving quantities above 20 liters cannot be released on bond/security during trial—only after final judgment. The police also opposed return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 715/2026
Case Summary: CR.M.A No. 715-2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking return of a seized mobile phone (Vivo V-27 model) during pendency of the case. Key Reasoning: Although the petitioner proved ownership through purchase bill and the seized phone matched his device, the court found the case involves liquor seizure exceeding 20 liters under the Prohibition Act. Per mandatory provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition (Liquor Samples) Rules 2019, contraband items in cases involving quantities above 20 liters cannot be released on bond/security during trial—only after final judgment. The police also opposed return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts