BANK OF BARODA THROUGH RAM DAYAL CHAOUDHARY vs SAMSHUNNISHA ISMAILNBHAI NOBI — 649/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJM020032322026
Filing Number
649/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
649/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR
Judge
9-10th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH RAM DAYAL CHAOUDHARY
Adv. J H ANADKAT
Respondent(s)
SAMSHUNNISHA ISMAILNBHAI NOBI
NAJIMABEN SHABBIRHUSEN MAKWA
Hearing History
Judge: 9-10th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
HEARING P.P.
HEARING P.P.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Bank of Baroda v. Samshunnisha Ismailbhai Nobi & Najimaben Shabbirhusen Makwa (649/2026) The 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jamnagar allowed Bank of Baroda's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a secured residential property (Sub-plot 211/6, Rabbani Park, Jamnagar) mortgaged by the borrowers. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession within 60 days, holding that an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate has authority to entertain such applications and that no prior notice to borrowers is required under SARFAESI procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Bank of Baroda v. Samshunnisha Ismailbhai Nobi & Najimaben Shabbirhusen Makwa (649/2026) The 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jamnagar allowed Bank of Baroda's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a secured residential property (Sub-plot 211/6, Rabbani Park, Jamnagar) mortgaged by the borrowers. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession within 60 days, holding that an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate has authority to entertain such applications and that no prior notice to borrowers is required under SARFAESI procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts