RAMESHBHAI MANJIBHAI BAMBHANIYA vs SANJANA BRASS INDUSTRIES - PARTNERSHIP FIRM Advocate - K N VASIYAR — 65/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 15th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJJM020022572023
Filing Number
65/2023
Filing Date
14-Feb-2023
Registration No
65/2023
Registration Date
14-Feb-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR
Judge
10-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESHBHAI MANJIBHAI BAMBHANIYA
Adv. R R KHANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJANA BRASS INDUSTRIES - PARTNERSHIP FIRM Advocate - K N VASIYAR
-
2.VELAJIBHAI DEVSIBHAI SORTHIYA - PARNER OF SANJANA BRASS INDUSTRIES
-
3.DARSHIT CHAMANBHAI SORATHIYA - PARTNER OF SANJANA BRASS INDUSTRIES
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 65/2023 The court dismissed the petitioner's execution application for default due to lack of prosecution. Despite the case being pending for over 3 years and the Supreme Court's directive to complete it within 6 months, the petitioner failed to appear or take any further steps, leading to dismissal under default rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2026
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2026
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Feb-2026
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2026
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2026
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Jan-2026
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Dec-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Dec-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Nov-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Oct-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Oct-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Aug-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Aug-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Jul-2025
Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jun-2025
Reply
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-May-2025
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Apr-2025
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Feb-2025
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jan-2025
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Dec-2024
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Nov-2024
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Sep-2024
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Aug-2024
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Jun-2024
Reply
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-May-2024
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Apr-2024
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Mar-2024
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Mar-2024
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Feb-2024
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jan-2024
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Dec-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Nov-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Sep-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Aug-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jul-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Jun-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Apr-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Mar-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Mar-2023
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2023
Summary of Case 65/2023 The court dismissed the petitioner's execution application for default due to lack of prosecution. Despite the case being pending for over 3 years and the Supreme Court's directive to complete it within 6 months, the petitioner failed to appear or take any further steps, leading to dismissal under default rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts