P.GV.C.L. THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs PINJARA SALIM KARIM PANKAHARA — 20/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM020007322026

Filing Number

20/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.GV.C.L. THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER

    Adv. B C CHOTAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PINJARA SALIM KARIM PANKAHARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PGVCL v. Pinjara Salim Karim Pankhara (20/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft recovery suit, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.44,678.51 with 6% simple interest per annum from filing. The court found the defendant guilty of electricity theft after an inspection revealed illegal meter bypassing—a 5-meter wire tapped directly into the main service line, enabling ~2.915 kW unauthorized consumption while evading meter recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PGVCL v. Pinjara Salim Karim Pankhara (20/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft recovery suit, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.44,678.51 with 6% simple interest per annum from filing. The court found the defendant guilty of electricity theft after an inspection revealed illegal meter bypassing—a 5-meter wire tapped directly into the main service line, enabling ~2.915 kW unauthorized consumption while evading meter recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case