Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. vs MANSUKH BATUKBHAI SIHORA Advocate - B H SOLANKI — 388/2023
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY
CNR: GJJM010044652023
Filing Number
388/2023
Filing Date
14-Dec-2023
Registration No
388/2023
Registration Date
14-Dec-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1179
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd.
Adv. D R TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANSUKH BATUKBHAI SIHORA Advocate - B H SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 388/2023 - Special (Electricity) Court, Jamnagar Case Overview Petitioner: Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. Respondent/Accused: Mansukh Batukbhai Sihora Charge: Electricity theft under Indian Electricity Act 2003, Section 135 Judgment Date: 09 April 2026 Court's Decision The accused Mansukh Batukbhai Sihora is acquitted of all charges. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the electricity theft allegation beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence presented by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company lacked corroboration from independent witnesses and technical documentation required to establish the unauthorized electricity connection and theft. The court ordered the accused's bail cancelled and directed his release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Dec-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-May-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 388/2023
Summary of Case 388/2023 - Special (Electricity) Court, Jamnagar Case Overview Petitioner: Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. Respondent/Accused: Mansukh Batukbhai Sihora Charge: Electricity theft under Indian Electricity Act 2003, Section 135 Judgment Date: 09 April 2026 Court's Decision The accused Mansukh Batukbhai Sihora is acquitted of all charges. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the electricity theft allegation beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence presented by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company lacked corroboration from independent witnesses and technical documentation required to establish the unauthorized electricity connection and theft. The court ordered the accused's bail cancelled and directed his release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts