Government of Gujarat vs SHANTILAL VIRJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - I H GAGDANI — 26/2024

Case under The Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 Section 4(3),5(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

GLGP - GUJARAT LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL CASES

CNR: GJJM010043072024

Filing Number

26/2024

Filing Date

30-Nov-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

30-Nov-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR

Judge

3-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202009242032

Police Station

JAMNAGAR CITY B DIV. POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 Section 4(3),5(3)
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. M P JANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANTILAL VIRJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - I H GAGDANI

  2. 2.DHIRAJLAL VIRJIBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. I H GAGDANI

  3. 3.NANDUBEN VIRJIBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. I H GAGDANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 26/2024 Court: Jamnagar Sessions Court, Gujarat Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Shantilal Virjibhai Parmar, Dhirajlal Virjibhai Parmar, and Nanduben Virjibhai Parmar Decision Date: 02/04/2026 Summary The court convicted the three respondents under Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act 2020 (Sections 4(3), 5(g)) and IPC Sections 352, 351(3) for unlawfully entering and occupying a property in Gulabnagar, Jamnagar belonging to the informant. The court found that the respondents, acting in concert, criminally trespassed, damaged the property's structures, threatened the rightful owner, and engaged in related criminal acts, establishing beyond doubt the prosecution's case for property encroachment and intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  23. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  24. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  25. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  26. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 23-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 09-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  30. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  31. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  32. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  33. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  34. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  35. 29-Jan-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  36. 16-Jan-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  37. 31-Dec-2024

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  38. 17-Dec-2024

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  39. 03-Dec-2024

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  40. 30-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 30-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 26/2024 Court: Jamnagar Sessions Court, Gujarat Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Shantilal Virjibhai Parmar, Dhirajlal Virjibhai Parmar, and Nanduben Virjibhai Parmar Decision Date: 02/04/2026 Summary The court convicted the three respondents under Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act 2020 (Sections 4(3), 5(g)) and IPC Sections 352, 351(3) for unlawfully entering and occupying a property in Gulabnagar, Jamnagar belonging to the informant. The court found that the respondents, acting in concert, criminally trespassed, damaged the property's structures, threatened the rightful owner, and engaged in related criminal acts, establishing beyond doubt the prosecution's case for property encroachment and intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case