Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. vs PRAVINBHAI SOMABHAI NAJIR Advocate - N N JADEJA — 303/2023
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd June 2026.
ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY
CNR: GJJM010038682023
Filing Number
303/2023
Filing Date
18-Oct-2023
Registration No
303/2023
Registration Date
18-Oct-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
22-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1843
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd.
Adv. D R TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAVINBHAI SOMABHAI NAJIR Advocate - N N JADEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jun-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Special (Electricity) Case No. 303/2023 Court: Special (Electricity) Court, Jamnagar Judgment Date: 22 June 2026 Accused: Pravinbhai Somabhai Najir Charge: Electricity theft under Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135 Verdict: Acquitted — The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite allegations that the accused stole electricity worth ₹1,68,351 by illegally connecting to power lines near his residence in Lalpuram on 20 May 2023, insufficient corroborating evidence and weak witness testimonies rendered the charge unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-May-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-May-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
12-Jan-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 303/2023
Case Summary: Special (Electricity) Case No. 303/2023 Court: Special (Electricity) Court, Jamnagar Judgment Date: 22 June 2026 Accused: Pravinbhai Somabhai Najir Charge: Electricity theft under Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135 Verdict: Acquitted — The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite allegations that the accused stole electricity worth ₹1,68,351 by illegally connecting to power lines near his residence in Lalpuram on 20 May 2023, insufficient corroborating evidence and weak witness testimonies rendered the charge unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts