Government of Gujarat vs SUBHASH MOTILAL MEDA Advocate - N D KANJARIA — 33/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)N,376(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJJM010025992024

Filing Number

33/2024

Filing Date

05-Jul-2024

Registration No

33/2024

Registration Date

05-Jul-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR

Judge

3-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202046240501

Police Station

JAMNAGAR PANCH B DIV. POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)N,376(3)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. P J PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH MOTILAL MEDA Advocate - N D KANJARIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: SPO (POCSO) Case No. 33/2024 Court Decision: The Special POCSO Court in Jamnagar convicted the accused, Subhash Motilal Meda, under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N), 376(3), and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The court found the accused guilty of kidnapping, enticing, and sexually abusing a 13-year-old minor girl with promises of marriage, and sentenced him to imprisonment with a bond of Rs. 10,000. The court's reasoning centered on established evidence of the victim's minority status through birth certificates, medical examination findings confirming sexual abuse, and the victim's credible testimony corroborating the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  23. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  24. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  25. 26-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  26. 12-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  30. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  31. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  33. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  34. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  35. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  36. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  37. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  38. 29-Nov-2024

    Framing Of Charge

    3rd Addl District Judge

  39. 20-Nov-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  40. 06-Nov-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  41. 16-Oct-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  42. 07-Oct-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  43. 23-Sep-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  44. 10-Sep-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  45. 27-Aug-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  46. 13-Aug-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  47. 30-Jul-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  48. 16-Jul-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  49. 05-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 05-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SPO (POCSO) Case No. 33/2024 Court Decision: The Special POCSO Court in Jamnagar convicted the accused, Subhash Motilal Meda, under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N), 376(3), and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The court found the accused guilty of kidnapping, enticing, and sexually abusing a 13-year-old minor girl with promises of marriage, and sentenced him to imprisonment with a bond of Rs. 10,000. The court's reasoning centered on established evidence of the victim's minority status through birth certificates, medical examination findings confirming sexual abuse, and the victim's credible testimony corroborating the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case