Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. vs DIPAKBHAI JIVABHAI PIPAROTAR Advocate - C K BHATT — 128/2023
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 29th April 2026.
ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY
CNR: GJJM010022452023
Filing Number
128/2023
Filing Date
04-Jul-2023
Registration No
128/2023
Registration Date
04-Jul-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
15-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
2039
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd.
Adv. P J PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPAKBHAI JIVABHAI PIPAROTAR Advocate - C K BHATT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 128/2023 - Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. v. Dipakbhai Jivabhai Piparotar The court acquitted the accused Dipakbhai Jivabhai Piparotar of electricity theft charges under the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural violations: the checking was conducted by unauthorized officials without a competent authority's permission, there was no independent witness present during site inspection, and crucial evidence regarding meter and wire condition was not properly documented through formal panchnama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Further Statement
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Jun-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-May-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Dec-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Oct-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Aug-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 128/2023
Case Summary: 128/2023 - Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. v. Dipakbhai Jivabhai Piparotar The court acquitted the accused Dipakbhai Jivabhai Piparotar of electricity theft charges under the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural violations: the checking was conducted by unauthorized officials without a competent authority's permission, there was no independent witness present during site inspection, and crucial evidence regarding meter and wire condition was not properly documented through formal panchnama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts