KARAN SON OF HASMUKHBHAI MAKVANA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D R TRIVEDI — 356/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJM010010112026
Filing Number
356/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
356/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202056250966
Police Station
KALAVAD RURAL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARAN SON OF HASMUKHBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. J M SOMAIYA
-
2.BHAVNABEN WIE OF HASMUKHBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. J M SOMAIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - D R TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary Case 356/2026 - Sessions Court, Jamnagar The Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Karan and Bhavnaben (both accused under the Prohibition Act) filed under CrPC Section 483. The court found the charges—involving unlawful manufacture and possession of illicit liquor in quantities of 300 and 2000 liters worth ₹60,000 and ₹40,000 respectively—to be serious offenses with substantial evidence of guilt. Though other co-accused received bail previously, the petitioners' prior convictions under similar charges and history of absconding during investigations weighed against granting bail, as did the enhanced Prohibition Act provisions aimed at curtailing drug manufacturing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 356/2026
Case Summary Case 356/2026 - Sessions Court, Jamnagar The Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Karan and Bhavnaben (both accused under the Prohibition Act) filed under CrPC Section 483. The court found the charges—involving unlawful manufacture and possession of illicit liquor in quantities of 300 and 2000 liters worth ₹60,000 and ₹40,000 respectively—to be serious offenses with substantial evidence of guilt. Though other co-accused received bail previously, the petitioners' prior convictions under similar charges and history of absconding during investigations weighed against granting bail, as did the enhanced Prohibition Act provisions aimed at curtailing drug manufacturing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts