RATILAL DEVSHIBHAI CHOVTIYA vs Government of Gujarat — 334/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJM010009662026
Filing Number
334/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
334/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202045260131
Police Station
JAMNAGAR PANCH A DIV. POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RATILAL DEVSHIBHAI CHOVTIYA
Adv. B H CHOTAI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ratilal Devsibhai Chovtiya v. Government of Gujarat (CRMA 334/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar granted anticipatory bail to 64-year-old Ratilal Devsibhai Chovtiya, accused under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act-2020 for allegedly constructing rooms and illegally occupying disputed land. The court found no prima facie case against the applicant, no criminal antecedents, and determined that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, particularly noting that a co-accused received similar bail and a related civil suit was pending. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with conditions including monthly police station appearances and restrictions on leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ratilal Devsibhai Chovtiya v. Government of Gujarat (CRMA 334/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar granted anticipatory bail to 64-year-old Ratilal Devsibhai Chovtiya, accused under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act-2020 for allegedly constructing rooms and illegally occupying disputed land. The court found no prima facie case against the applicant, no criminal antecedents, and determined that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, particularly noting that a co-accused received similar bail and a related civil suit was pending. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with conditions including monthly police station appearances and restrictions on leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts