RAJENDRASINH CHANDRASINH SOLANKI vs Government of Gujarat — 333/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJM010009652026
Filing Number
333/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
333/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
15-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202058260001
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRASINH CHANDRASINH SOLANKI
Adv. J N JHALA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 15-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 333/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar granted regular bail to Rajendrasinh Chandrasinh Solanki, a 63-year-old farmer accused in a cybercrime extortion case involving AI-generated defamatory videos and extortion threats of Rs. 23 lakhs. The court found that while the applicant was accused of gathering secret information and forwarding it to co-conspirators, there was no evidence he directly contacted victims or created the defamatory content, and his peripheral role combined with the 10-year maximum sentence and his local residence supported bail eligibility. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with standard conditions including trial attendance, non-tampering with witnesses, and passport deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 333/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar granted regular bail to Rajendrasinh Chandrasinh Solanki, a 63-year-old farmer accused in a cybercrime extortion case involving AI-generated defamatory videos and extortion threats of Rs. 23 lakhs. The court found that while the applicant was accused of gathering secret information and forwarding it to co-conspirators, there was no evidence he directly contacted victims or created the defamatory content, and his peripheral role combined with the 10-year maximum sentence and his local residence supported bail eligibility. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with standard conditions including trial attendance, non-tampering with witnesses, and passport deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts