MIT URFE MITLO SUNILBHAI BARIA vs Government of Gujarat — 327/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJM010009492026

Filing Number

327/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

327/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR

Judge

7-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202002260262

Police Station

JAMNAGAR CITY-C POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 309(3),309(6),351(3),352,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MIT URFE MITLO SUNILBHAI BARIA

    Adv. R V CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Mit Sunilbhai Bariya (Accused No. 3) in a case involving alleged robbery and assault. The judge found that since the charge-sheet was already filed, the accused's presence was no longer needed for investigation, and detaining him indefinitely would constitute pre-trial punishment, especially given his young age and family dependence. Bail was granted on a Rs. 25,000 surety with strict conditions including monthly police station reporting, court appearance, passport surrender, and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 327/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Mit Sunilbhai Bariya (Accused No. 3) in a case involving alleged robbery and assault. The judge found that since the charge-sheet was already filed, the accused's presence was no longer needed for investigation, and detaining him indefinitely would constitute pre-trial punishment, especially given his young age and family dependence. Bail was granted on a Rs. 25,000 surety with strict conditions including monthly police station reporting, court appearance, passport surrender, and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case