BRIJESH BHAVESHBHAI PANDYA vs DIPALI BRIJESHBHAI PANDYA Advocate - A V PARMAR — 316/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th May 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJM010008142026
Filing Number
316/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
316/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
16-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
25-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJESH BHAVESHBHAI PANDYA
Adv. D N BHEDA
-
2.HEMLATABEN BHAVESHBHAI PANDYA
Adv. D N BHEDA
-
3.BHAVESH KISHORBHAI PANDYA
Adv. D N BHEDA
-
4.RADHIKA HARITBHAI RAVAL
Adv. D N BHEDA
-
5.GITABEN PRAMODBHAI DAVE
Adv. D N BHEDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPALI BRIJESHBHAI PANDYA Advocate - A V PARMAR
-
2.VEDANSHI BRIJESHBHAI PANDYA
Adv. A V PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar granted an application to condone a 140-day delay in filing an appeal against a partially allowed order from September 20, 2025. The court found the applicants' reasons genuine—elderly ill parents and the lead applicant's contract-based employment as an Ayurvedic doctor prevented timely legal consultation—and applied established judicial principles favoring substantial justice over technical procedural grounds. The delay was condoned on condition of depositing ₹7,000 with the DLSA, Jamnagar, and the appeal was directed to be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-May-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
14-May-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
02-May-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Cross-Objection/Reply
5th Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Cross-Objection/Reply
5th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 316/2026
The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar granted an application to condone a 140-day delay in filing an appeal against a partially allowed order from September 20, 2025. The court found the applicants' reasons genuine—elderly ill parents and the lead applicant's contract-based employment as an Ayurvedic doctor prevented timely legal consultation—and applied established judicial principles favoring substantial justice over technical procedural grounds. The delay was condoned on condition of depositing ₹7,000 with the DLSA, Jamnagar, and the appeal was directed to be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts