BHANDERI PAYALBEN JAYMINBHAI vs Government of Gujarat — 80/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJJM010005242026
Filing Number
80/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
80/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
7-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHANDERI PAYALBEN JAYMINBHAI
Adv. D K GACHCHHAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
SUNIL NAVINCHANDRA GORI PROP OF VARAHI FINANCE
Hearing History
Judge: 7-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar partially allowed the appeal against the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, accepting the parties' compromise and quashing the imprisonment sentence. The court compounded the offence under Section 147 of the NIA, 1881, conditioned on the accused depositing Rs. 30,000 (7.5% of the cheque amount of Rs. 4,00,000) with the District Legal Services Authority within two weeks; failure to deposit would automatically annul the relief and restore the imprisonment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar partially allowed the appeal against the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, accepting the parties' compromise and quashing the imprisonment sentence. The court compounded the offence under Section 147 of the NIA, 1881, conditioned on the accused depositing Rs. 30,000 (7.5% of the cheque amount of Rs. 4,00,000) with the District Legal Services Authority within two weeks; failure to deposit would automatically annul the relief and restore the imprisonment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts