Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. vs SHANTUBA WIFE OF VIKRAMSINH MANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N R JADEJA — 6/2023
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY
CNR: GJJM010002352023
Filing Number
6/2023
Filing Date
19-Jan-2023
Registration No
6/2023
Registration Date
19-Jan-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
15-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1264
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd.
Adv. P J PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHANTUBA WIFE OF VIKRAMSINH MANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N R JADEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. vs. Shantuba (Case 6/2023) The court acquitted the accused Shantuba Vikramsinh Manubha Jadeja of electricity theft charges under the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural violations: the checking and inspection were conducted without authorized officers present, the seized evidence (wiring) was not properly documented, and the prosecution could not establish the accused's possession or use of the checked location, creating substantial doubt about the case's merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
15-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Further Statement
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-Jan-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Nov-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Sep-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2023
Case Summary: Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. vs. Shantuba (Case 6/2023) The court acquitted the accused Shantuba Vikramsinh Manubha Jadeja of electricity theft charges under the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural violations: the checking and inspection were conducted without authorized officers present, the seized evidence (wiring) was not properly documented, and the prosecution could not establish the accused's possession or use of the checked location, creating substantial doubt about the case's merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts