Government of Gujarat vs SANDIPBHAI DILIPBHAI METHIYA Advocate - N B BUDDHBHATTI — 4/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),306,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJJM010000702023
Filing Number
4/2023
Filing Date
07-01-2023
Registration No
4/2023
Registration Date
07-01-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
15-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202002221489
Police Station
JAMNAGAR CITY-C POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. M P JANI
Respondent(s)
SANDIPBHAI DILIPBHAI METHIYA Advocate - N B BUDDHBHATTI
DILIPBHAI TRIKAMBHAI METHIYA
Adv. N B BUDDHBHATTI
JASHODABEN WIFE OF DILIPBHAI TRIKAMBHAI METHIYA
Adv. N B BUDDHBHATTI
Hearing History
Judge: 15-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY In Sessions Case No. 04/2023, the court acquitted three defendants (Sandipbhai Dilipbhai Methiya, Dilipbhai Trikambhai Methiya, and Jashodaben) of charges under IPC sections 498-A, 306, 114, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt—the victim's own family members (her parents and brother) did not support the prosecution's case, and the police investigation was found inadequate with no independent witnesses corroborating the allegations of dowry harassment and cruelty that allegedly drove the victim to suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY In Sessions Case No. 04/2023, the court acquitted three defendants (Sandipbhai Dilipbhai Methiya, Dilipbhai Trikambhai Methiya, and Jashodaben) of charges under IPC sections 498-A, 306, 114, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt—the victim's own family members (her parents and brother) did not support the prosecution's case, and the police investigation was found inadequate with no independent witnesses corroborating the allegations of dowry harassment and cruelty that allegedly drove the victim to suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts