VASHRAM URFE ARYAN ARSHIBHAI CHAUHAN vs The State Of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 17/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGS090000672026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
17/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - KODINAR
Judge
1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VASHRAM URFE ARYAN ARSHIBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. A M NAQVI
Respondent(s)
The State Of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted regular bail to Vashram @ Aryan Aarshibhai Chauhan, accused of abducting a 16-year-old girl, after finding prima facie evidence that the victim left willingly with him against her mother's wishes rather than being forcibly abducted. The court released him on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception," while imposing strict conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and restriction from leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted regular bail to Vashram @ Aryan Aarshibhai Chauhan, accused of abducting a 16-year-old girl, after finding prima facie evidence that the victim left willingly with him against her mother's wishes rather than being forcibly abducted. The court released him on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception," while imposing strict conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and restriction from leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts