The State Of Gujarat vs BALVANTGIRI PREMGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - B K RATHOD — 12/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY
CNR: GJGS090000602026
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - KODINAR
Judge
1-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
520
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALVANTGIRI PREMGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - B K RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Order
The court acquitted accused Balvantgiri Premgiri Goswami under Section 152(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, after the electricity supplier P.G.V.C.L. filed a pursis (withdrawal notice) stating the accused had paid the outstanding bill of Rs. 9,000 and compounding charges of Rs. 1,000. The prosecution was dropped as the accused resolved the matter by payment, and the court proceeded to acquit him of the Section 135 offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2026
The court acquitted accused Balvantgiri Premgiri Goswami under Section 152(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, after the electricity supplier P.G.V.C.L. filed a pursis (withdrawal notice) stating the accused had paid the outstanding bill of Rs. 9,000 and compounding charges of Rs. 1,000. The prosecution was dropped as the accused resolved the matter by payment, and the court proceeded to acquit him of the Section 135 offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts