AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF SHAHPOORJI PALONJI ENERGY GUJARAT PVT LTD vs NIMUBEN URFE NAYANABEN D/O SHRI BHAGVAN DUDA SOSA W/O HARESHBHAI URFE RAJKUMAR KARSHANBHAI VADHER Advocate - P P BHATT — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJGS090000462025
Filing Number
3/2025
Filing Date
19-02-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
19-02-2025
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - KODINAR
Judge
1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF SHAHPOORJI PALONJI ENERGY GUJARAT PVT LTD
Adv. P B ADHYARU
Respondent(s)
NIMUBEN URFE NAYANABEN D/O SHRI BHAGVAN DUDA SOSA W/O HARESHBHAI URFE RAJKUMAR KARSHANBHAI VADHER Advocate - P P BHATT
UKABHAI DUDABHAI SOSA
Adv. A P VALA
AJAYKUMAR BABUBHAI PARMAR
Adv. H G RATHOD
SANJAYKUMAR BABUBHAI PARMAR
Adv. H G RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 07-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCA No-03/2025 (Shahpoorji Palonji Energy Gujarat Pvt Ltd) Court Decision: The High Court set aside the trial court's judgment dated 13/11/2024, which had granted the plaintiff's partition suit claim. The appellate court found the plaintiff's case barred by the law of limitation and lacked valid grounds for the relief sought. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the plaintiff (Nimuben) failed to establish her inheritance rights in the disputed agricultural land within the statutory limitation period. The defendants (land purchasers in 2006 and 2010) qualified as bona fide purchasers for value without notice, having acquired valid registered sale deeds. The court rejected the claim that registered transfer deeds could be invalidated after 14-20 years, particularly where purchasers had exercised uninterrupted possession and made revenue payments, holding such claims are barred by limitation law and established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCA No-03/2025 (Shahpoorji Palonji Energy Gujarat Pvt Ltd) Court Decision: The High Court set aside the trial court's judgment dated 13/11/2024, which had granted the plaintiff's partition suit claim. The appellate court found the plaintiff's case barred by the law of limitation and lacked valid grounds for the relief sought. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the plaintiff (Nimuben) failed to establish her inheritance rights in the disputed agricultural land within the statutory limitation period. The defendants (land purchasers in 2006 and 2010) qualified as bona fide purchasers for value without notice, having acquired valid registered sale deeds. The court rejected the claim that registered transfer deeds could be invalidated after 14-20 years, particularly where purchasers had exercised uninterrupted possession and made revenue payments, holding such claims are barred by limitation law and established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts