THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs REKHABEN W/O BABAUBHAI NATHUBHAI KHASIYA Advocate - S S ZAVERI — 789/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS080010972025

Filing Number

789/2025

Filing Date

30-Oct-2025

Registration No

789/2025

Registration Date

30-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186001250655

Police Station

GIR GADHADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REKHABEN W/O BABAUBHAI NATHUBHAI KHASIYA Advocate - S S ZAVERI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 789/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rekhaben W/O Babaubhai Nathubhai Khasiya, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65F for alleged illegal liquor possession. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily due to insufficient corroborating evidence and credibility issues with witness testimonies. Key Reasoning: The court noted that panchanama (seizure record) witnesses provided contradictory statements and the investigating officer's testimony alone could not establish the authenticity of the seized contraband. Critical gaps in independent corroboration rendered the prosecution's case doubtful, necessitating acquittal based on the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 30-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 789/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 789/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rekhaben W/O Babaubhai Nathubhai Khasiya, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65F for alleged illegal liquor possession. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily due to insufficient corroborating evidence and credibility issues with witness testimonies. Key Reasoning: The court noted that panchanama (seizure record) witnesses provided contradictory statements and the investigating officer's testimony alone could not establish the authenticity of the seized contraband. Critical gaps in independent corroboration rendered the prosecution's case doubtful, necessitating acquittal based on the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case