THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHAYABHAI URFE ASHOKBHAI DHIRUBHAI VAJA Advocate - R R SOLANKI — 766/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS080010682025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

766/2025

Filing Date

10-10-2025

Registration No

766/2025

Registration Date

10-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186001250575

Police Station

GIR GADHADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BHAYABHAI URFE ASHOKBHAI DHIRUBHAI VAJA Advocate - R R SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

16-02-2026

PLEA

22-01-2026

PLEA

06-01-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused Bhayabhai Urfe Ashokbhai Dhirubhai Vaja guilty of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 185, and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹1,100 (₹100 for prohibition violation and ₹1,000 for traffic violation), with a 2-day simple imprisonment as default if the fine is not paid. The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and imposed a lenient sentence considering his family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Bhayabhai Urfe Ashokbhai Dhirubhai Vaja guilty of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 185, and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹1,100 (₹100 for prohibition violation and ₹1,000 for traffic violation), with a 2-day simple imprisonment as default if the fine is not paid. The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and imposed a lenient sentence considering his family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case