PGVCL SUB DIV GIRGADHADA vs CHANABHAI RANCHHODBHAI MAKVANA — 92/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJGS080010442025
Filing Number
92/2025
Filing Date
06-Oct-2025
Registration No
92/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SUB DIV GIRGADHADA
Adv. P P BHATT
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHANABHAI RANCHHODBHAI MAKVANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Principal Civil Judge of Gir Gadhada disposed of Regular Execution Petition No. 92/2025 by accepting the decree-holder's withdrawal application after a compromise was reached between the decree-holder and judgment-debtor. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Payment Of Decree Amount
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Payment Of Decree Amount
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Payment Of Decree Amount
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Payment Of Decree Amount
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2025
The Principal Civil Judge of Gir Gadhada disposed of Regular Execution Petition No. 92/2025 by accepting the decree-holder's withdrawal application after a compromise was reached between the decree-holder and judgment-debtor. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts