VIRABHAI JADAVBHAI CHUDASAMA vs MADHUBEN RANCHODBHAI MANDAVIYA Advocate - P D SOLANKI — 35/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 31. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGS080007832025

Filing Number

35/2025

Filing Date

19-Jul-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

19-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 31
Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,37
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Interlocutory Application Section VIRABHAI JADAVBHAI CHUDASAMAMADHUBEN RANCHODBHAI MANDAVIYA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIRABHAI JADAVBHAI CHUDASAMA

    Adv. M H BAMBHANIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHUBEN RANCHODBHAI MANDAVIYA Advocate - P D SOLANKI

  2. 2.HITESHKUMAR DEVASHIBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. K T RATHOD

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from interfering with agricultural land possession and transferring the property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable harm, as the suit lacked a prayer for permanent injunction and the defendants' registered sale deeds and revenue mutations were presumptively valid. Costs shall follow the final suit outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 02-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 17-Sep-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 25-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 19-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 19-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from interfering with agricultural land possession and transferring the property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable harm, as the suit lacked a prayer for permanent injunction and the defendants' registered sale deeds and revenue mutations were presumptively valid. Costs shall follow the final suit outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case