THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HARESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI BARAIYA — 289/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS080003712026

Filing Number

289/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

289/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186001260130

Police Station

GIR GADHADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI BARAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 289/2026 Summary The State of Gujarat prosecuted Hareshbhai Dhirubhai Baraiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b). The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and pleaded guilty. The court found the confession genuine and voluntary, and considering it was the accused's first offense and he had family dependents to support, sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 289/2026 Summary The State of Gujarat prosecuted Hareshbhai Dhirubhai Baraiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b). The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and pleaded guilty. The court found the confession genuine and voluntary, and considering it was the accused's first offense and he had family dependents to support, sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case