PGVCL SUB DIV DHOKADAVA vs MADHUBHAI PITTHABHAI SARVAIYA — 16/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJGS080001692026

Filing Number

16/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL SUB DIV DHOKADAVA

    Adv. P P BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHUBHAI PITTHABHAI SARVAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sub Div Dhokadava against Madhubhai Pitthabhai Sarvaiya for default of the decree holder. No one appeared on behalf of the decree holder, no applications were filed, and the plaintiff's representative failed to assist the bailiff in serving the warrant, indicating loss of interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Payment Of Decree Amount

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Payment Of Decree Amount

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sub Div Dhokadava against Madhubhai Pitthabhai Sarvaiya for default of the decree holder. No one appeared on behalf of the decree holder, no applications were filed, and the plaintiff's representative failed to assist the bailiff in serving the warrant, indicating loss of interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case