PARTH CHIMANBHAI KANANI vs ABHAY KARSHANBHAI BHALIYA — 72/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS080000932026

Filing Number

72/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

72/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GIRGADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARTH CHIMANBHAI KANANI

    Adv. J P JANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABHAY KARSHANBHAI BHALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted complainant Parth Chimanbhai Kanani's application to withdraw the Negotiable Instrument Act complaint against Abhay Karshanbhai Bhaliya, finding the offense compoundable in nature. The criminal case was disposed of and the accused was acquitted under Section 257 CrPC for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted complainant Parth Chimanbhai Kanani's application to withdraw the Negotiable Instrument Act complaint against Abhay Karshanbhai Bhaliya, finding the offense compoundable in nature. The criminal case was disposed of and the accused was acquitted under Section 257 CrPC for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case