THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RIYAZBHAI HUSHENBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - R F CHAUHAN — 530/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),98,(2),99,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS070006252024
Filing Number
530/2024
Filing Date
06-04-2024
Registration No
530/2024
Registration Date
06-04-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186007220323
Police Station
TALALA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RIYAZBHAI HUSHENBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - R F CHAUHAN
RAJABBHAI UKABHAI BHALIYA
Adv. R F CHAUHAN
UMARBHAI JUMMABHAI KHOKHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-05-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 13-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 06-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. P30/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talala, acquitted all three accused (Riyazbhai Hushenbhai Makavana, Rajabbhai Ukabhai Bhaliya, and Umarbhai Jummabhai Khokhar) of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural lapses including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper FSL evidence regarding seizure quality/quantity, failure to recover contraband directly from the accused, and procedural irregularities in the investigation that rendered the prosecution case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. P30/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talala, acquitted all three accused (Riyazbhai Hushenbhai Makavana, Rajabbhai Ukabhai Bhaliya, and Umarbhai Jummabhai Khokhar) of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural lapses including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper FSL evidence regarding seizure quality/quantity, failure to recover contraband directly from the accused, and procedural irregularities in the investigation that rendered the prosecution case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts