THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RIYAZBHAI HUSHENBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - R F CHAUHAN — 530/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),98,(2),99,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS070006252024

Case disposed

Filing Number

530/2024

Filing Date

06-04-2024

Registration No

530/2024

Registration Date

06-04-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186007220323

Police Station

TALALA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),98,(2),99,81

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RIYAZBHAI HUSHENBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - R F CHAUHAN

RAJABBHAI UKABHAI BHALIYA

Adv. R F CHAUHAN

UMARBHAI JUMMABHAI KHOKHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-05-2026

Disposed

26-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

05-05-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

13-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

06-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

30-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. P30/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talala, acquitted all three accused (Riyazbhai Hushenbhai Makavana, Rajabbhai Ukabhai Bhaliya, and Umarbhai Jummabhai Khokhar) of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural lapses including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper FSL evidence regarding seizure quality/quantity, failure to recover contraband directly from the accused, and procedural irregularities in the investigation that rendered the prosecution case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. P30/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talala, acquitted all three accused (Riyazbhai Hushenbhai Makavana, Rajabbhai Ukabhai Bhaliya, and Umarbhai Jummabhai Khokhar) of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural lapses including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper FSL evidence regarding seizure quality/quantity, failure to recover contraband directly from the accused, and procedural irregularities in the investigation that rendered the prosecution case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, TALALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case