THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RIYAZBHAI HUSHENBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - R F CHAUHAN — 530/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),98,(2),99,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS070006252024

Filing Number

530/2024

Filing Date

06-Apr-2024

Registration No

530/2024

Registration Date

06-Apr-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALALA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186007220323

Police Station

TALALA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),98,(2),99,81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RIYAZBHAI HUSHENBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - R F CHAUHAN

  2. 2.RAJABBHAI UKABHAI BHALIYA

    Adv. R F CHAUHAN

  3. 3.UMARBHAI JUMMABHAI KHOKHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. P30/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talala, acquitted all three accused (Riyazbhai Hushenbhai Makavana, Rajabbhai Ukabhai Bhaliya, and Umarbhai Jummabhai Khokhar) of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural lapses including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper FSL evidence regarding seizure quality/quantity, failure to recover contraband directly from the accused, and procedural irregularities in the investigation that rendered the prosecution case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-May-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 17-May-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 01-Mar-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 26-Dec-2024

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 04-Oct-2024

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 13-Aug-2024

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 31-Jul-2024

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 22-Jun-2024

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 22-Jun-2024

    Restored

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 12-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 07-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 06-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 530/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. P30/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Talala, acquitted all three accused (Riyazbhai Hushenbhai Makavana, Rajabbhai Ukabhai Bhaliya, and Umarbhai Jummabhai Khokhar) of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural lapses including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper FSL evidence regarding seizure quality/quantity, failure to recover contraband directly from the accused, and procedural irregularities in the investigation that rendered the prosecution case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case