PRABHUDAS HARJIVAN LODHIYA vs REKHABEN W/O GHANSHYAM MAKODBHAI SATHALIYA Advocate - R F CHUVAN — 476/2010

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 114,379. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS070003782010

Filing Number

476/2010

Filing Date

08-Dec-2010

Registration No

476/2010

Registration Date

08-Dec-2010

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALALA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

I 89

Police Station

TALALA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2010

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 114,379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHUDAS HARJIVAN LODHIYA

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REKHABEN W/O GHANSHYAM MAKODBHAI SATHALIYA Advocate - R F CHUVAN

  2. 2.GHANSHYAM MAKODBHAI SATHALIYA

    Adv. R F CHUVAN

  3. 3.MUKESH @MUNNO MANJI KATHIYA

    Adv. R F CHUVAN

  4. 4.RAMESH@ RAMNIK KESHUBHAI VALDOLIYA

    Adv. J M KUMBHANI

  5. 5.DHIRU VRUJLAL MADANI

    Adv. R F CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: C.C. No. 476/2010 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendants Ghanshyamabhai Makodbhai Sathaliya and Ramesh Keshabhai Baldoliya of theft charges under IPC Sections 379 and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Defendants Rekhaben, Mukesh, and Dhirubhai were discharged under CrPC Section 299. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that gold beads (84 pieces valued at Rs. 17,200) were allegedly stolen from the complainant's jewelry shop on 24 August 2010, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. Key prosecution witnesses either died or failed to corroborate the theft narrative during cross-examination. Witness testimony lacked direct observation of the accused committing the theft, and crucial documentary evidence (seizure panchnama) remained unsupported. The court applied the *Sharad Sarda* precedent requiring complete circumstantial evidence forming an unbreakable chain—which was absent here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 18-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 28-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 06-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 23-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 29-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 18-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 07-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 18-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 27-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 06-Mar-2023

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 09-Jan-2023

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 21-Nov-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 30-Sep-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 10-Aug-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 08-Jun-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 09-May-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 05-Apr-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 15-Mar-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 23-Feb-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 19-Jan-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 03-Jan-2022

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 20-Dec-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 06-Dec-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 23-Nov-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 30-Oct-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 13-Oct-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 29-Sep-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 21-Sep-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 08-Sep-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 10-Aug-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 05-Jul-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 31-May-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 27-Apr-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 31-Mar-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 01-Mar-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 01-Feb-2021

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 30-Dec-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 03-Dec-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 28-Oct-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 22-Sep-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 20-Aug-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 09-Jul-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 28-May-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 29-Apr-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 01-Apr-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 25-Feb-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 03-Feb-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 06-Jan-2020

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 10-Dec-2019

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  73. 20-Nov-2019

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  74. 23-Sep-2019

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  75. 15-Jun-2019

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  76. 29-Dec-2017

    Warrant Of Arrest ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  77. 29-Nov-2017

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  78. 05-Oct-2017

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  79. 28-Aug-2017

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  80. 05-Jul-2017

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  81. 10-May-2017

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  82. 21-Feb-2017

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  83. 26-Dec-2016

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  84. 14-Oct-2016

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  85. 25-Jul-2016

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  86. 20-May-2016

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  87. 03-Mar-2016

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  88. 15-Jan-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  89. 20-Nov-2015

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  90. 30-Sep-2015

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  91. 17-Aug-2015

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  92. 20-Jun-2015

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  93. 11-Mar-2015

    Summons - Notice

  94. 20-Oct-2014

    Summons - Notice

  95. 16-Jun-2014

    Summons - Notice

  96. 29-Mar-2014

    Summons - Notice

  97. 05-Feb-2014

    Summons - Notice

  98. 16-Nov-2013

    Summons - Notice

  99. 24-Jul-2013

    Summons - Notice

  100. 12-Apr-2013

    Summons - Notice

  101. 01-Nov-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  102. 08-Dec-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 476/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 476/2010 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendants Ghanshyamabhai Makodbhai Sathaliya and Ramesh Keshabhai Baldoliya of theft charges under IPC Sections 379 and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Defendants Rekhaben, Mukesh, and Dhirubhai were discharged under CrPC Section 299. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that gold beads (84 pieces valued at Rs. 17,200) were allegedly stolen from the complainant's jewelry shop on 24 August 2010, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. Key prosecution witnesses either died or failed to corroborate the theft narrative during cross-examination. Witness testimony lacked direct observation of the accused committing the theft, and crucial documentary evidence (seizure panchnama) remained unsupported. The court applied the *Sharad Sarda* precedent requiring complete circumstantial evidence forming an unbreakable chain—which was absent here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case