K.Sashikumar vs Jeram Valji Patel(Absconding) Advocate - D B VADHAVANA — 299/2008
Case under Wild Life (protection) Act, 1972 Section 002,009,050,051,052. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS070002282008
Filing Number
299/2008
Filing Date
12-09-2008
Registration No
299/2008
Registration Date
12-09-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
I 2
Police Station
ANKOLVADI RANGE FOREST OFFICE - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2007
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Sashikumar
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Jeram Valji Patel(Absconding) Advocate - D B VADHAVANA
Vinu Bachubhai
Adv. D B VADHAVANA
Raniben Bachubhai
Adv. D B VADHAVANA
Bachu Chana Devipujak
Adv. D B VADHAVANA
Vinod Manji Devipujak
Adv. D B VADHAVANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 21-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 299/2008 The Talala Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Jeramabhai Walabhai Akbari and Raniben Bachuabhai of charges under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 (poaching a leopard using electric shock). The court found the prosecution's case insufficient, noting that panch witnesses (independent witnesses to the seizure) failed to corroborate the alleged discovery of the dead leopard. The prosecution's documentary evidence, investigative procedures, and witness testimonies contained significant contradictions and lacked the conclusive proof required for conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Two additional accused died during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 299/2008 The Talala Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Jeramabhai Walabhai Akbari and Raniben Bachuabhai of charges under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 (poaching a leopard using electric shock). The court found the prosecution's case insufficient, noting that panch witnesses (independent witnesses to the seizure) failed to corroborate the alleged discovery of the dead leopard. The prosecution's documentary evidence, investigative procedures, and witness testimonies contained significant contradictions and lacked the conclusive proof required for conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Two additional accused died during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts