PGVCL SUB DIVISION-2 KODINAR vs RAYSINGBHAI JESINGBHAI VALA Advocate - M D GOHIL — 1446/2020
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 154(5). Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGS060023732020
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1446/2020
Filing Date
22-10-2020
Registration No
1446/2020
Registration Date
22-10-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, KODINAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SUB DIVISION-2 KODINAR
Adv. M.B.JANI
Respondent(s)
RAYSINGBHAI JESINGBHAI VALA Advocate - M D GOHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 15-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: R.M.No. 1446/2020 Outcome: The petition is dismissed for default. Despite repeated notices issued to the respondent, the respondent failed to appear, and the plaintiff also failed to serve notice on the respondent. The case is ordered to be dismissed as a suit for default due to the plaintiff's negligence and lack of prosecution. No costs are awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: R.M.No. 1446/2020 Outcome: The petition is dismissed for default. Despite repeated notices issued to the respondent, the respondent failed to appear, and the plaintiff also failed to serve notice on the respondent. The case is ordered to be dismissed as a suit for default due to the plaintiff's negligence and lack of prosecution. No costs are awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts