The State of Gujarat vs DHANRAJBHAI URFE AXAYBHAI BOGHABHAI GOHIL — 86/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS060001042026

Filing Number

86/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KODINAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186002251936

Police Station

KODINAR POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHANRAJBHAI URFE AXAYBHAI BOGHABHAI GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the respondent Dhanrajbhai Urfe Axaybhai Boghabhai Gohil under Section 65 IPC for the offense of impersonating a student. Considering the respondent's circumstances—that this was a first offense, he comes from a poor background with dependents—the court imposed a fine of Rs. 200 and two days simple imprisonment in lieu of fine, rather than awarding the full prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent Dhanrajbhai Urfe Axaybhai Boghabhai Gohil under Section 65 IPC for the offense of impersonating a student. Considering the respondent's circumstances—that this was a first offense, he comes from a poor background with dependents—the court imposed a fine of Rs. 200 and two days simple imprisonment in lieu of fine, rather than awarding the full prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case