The State of Gujarat vs LIYAKATRAJA FIDAHUSEN NAQVI — 36/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS060000512026

Filing Number

36/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

36/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KODINAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186002251603

Police Station

KODINAR POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LIYAKATRAJA FIDAHUSEN NAQVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 36/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Liyakatraja Fidahusen Naqvi The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85 for being found in a state of intoxication in a public place. Considering the respondent's first offense, impoverished background, and reformative objectives of the statute, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹100 or, in default, 2 days simple imprisonment, with bail bond to be submitted during the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 36/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Liyakatraja Fidahusen Naqvi The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85 for being found in a state of intoxication in a public place. Considering the respondent's first offense, impoverished background, and reformative objectives of the statute, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹100 or, in default, 2 days simple imprisonment, with bail bond to be submitted during the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case