The State of Gujarat vs DINESHBHAI RASIKBHAI MER — 35/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS060000502026

Filing Number

35/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KODINAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186002251462

Police Station

KODINAR POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI RASIKBHAI MER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Dineshbhai Rasikbhai Mer under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(1)(b) and 85 for being found in an intoxicated state in a public place and behaving indecently. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with imprisonment for 2 days as an alternative, considering his first offense status and poor economic circumstances. The judgment emphasizes the reformative purpose of sentencing law and was delivered on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Dineshbhai Rasikbhai Mer under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(1)(b) and 85 for being found in an intoxicated state in a public place and behaving indecently. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with imprisonment for 2 days as an alternative, considering his first offense status and poor economic circumstances. The judgment emphasizes the reformative purpose of sentencing law and was delivered on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case