Govt. of Gujarat vs ashokbhai kanabhai chohan Advocate - H M VAJA — 1214/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(f). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016792025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1214/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
1214/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
780
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
ashokbhai kanabhai chohan Advocate - H M VAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted accused Ashokbhai Kanabhai Chohaan of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(F), finding the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that despite seizure of illicit liquor, the prosecution's witnesses (panchas) did not adequately corroborate the evidence, and critical procedural gaps undermined the investigation's credibility, warranting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted accused Ashokbhai Kanabhai Chohaan of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(F), finding the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that despite seizure of illicit liquor, the prosecution's witnesses (panchas) did not adequately corroborate the evidence, and critical procedural gaps undermined the investigation's credibility, warranting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts