Govt. of Gujarat vs AXAYBHAI BHARATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1213/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F),65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016782025

Filing Number

1213/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

1213/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186006240980

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F),65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AXAYBHAI BHARATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Court Judgment Summary The Sutrapur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Akshaybhai Bhartbhai Bambhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 64(AA) and 64(F), finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key eyewitnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure of prohibited liquor from the accused's premises, and the prosecution could not definitively prove the contraband was recovered from the accused's personal possession or establish direct connection to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1213/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Sutrapur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Akshaybhai Bhartbhai Bambhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 64(AA) and 64(F), finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key eyewitnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure of prohibited liquor from the accused's premises, and the prosecution could not definitively prove the contraband was recovered from the accused's personal possession or establish direct connection to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case