Govt. of Gujarat vs AXAYBHAI BHARATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1213/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F),65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016782025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1213/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
1213/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186006240980
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
AXAYBHAI BHARATBHAI BAMBHANIYA Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Sutrapur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Akshaybhai Bhartbhai Bambhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 64(AA) and 64(F), finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key eyewitnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure of prohibited liquor from the accused's premises, and the prosecution could not definitively prove the contraband was recovered from the accused's personal possession or establish direct connection to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The Sutrapur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Akshaybhai Bhartbhai Bambhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 64(AA) and 64(F), finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key eyewitnesses (panchs) did not corroborate the seizure of prohibited liquor from the accused's premises, and the prosecution could not definitively prove the contraband was recovered from the accused's personal possession or establish direct connection to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts