Govt. of Gujarat vs arajanbhai mansukhbahi parmar Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1211/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016762025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1211/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
1211/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
985
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
arajanbhai mansukhbahi parmar Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sutraparada Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Arjanbhai Mansukhbhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence of illegal alcohol possession. The court determined that the prosecution witnesses (panchas) failed to adequately corroborate the seizure, and lacked proper technical evidence and clear chain of custody connecting the contraband directly to the accused, warranting benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sutraparada Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Arjanbhai Mansukhbhai Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence of illegal alcohol possession. The court determined that the prosecution witnesses (panchas) failed to adequately corroborate the seizure, and lacked proper technical evidence and clear chain of custody connecting the contraband directly to the accused, warranting benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts