Govt. of Gujarat vs arjanbhai govabhai bambhaniya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1208/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016732025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1208/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

1208/2025

Registration Date

10-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

990

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

arjanbhai govabhai bambhaniya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Arjanbhai Govabhai Bambhaniya, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor on 28/11/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient witness testimony from independent panchas (witnesses) and lack of technical evidence from the Forensic Science Laboratory. Applying the benefit of doubt principle fundamental to criminal jurisprudence, the court ordered the accused's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Arjanbhai Govabhai Bambhaniya, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor on 28/11/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient witness testimony from independent panchas (witnesses) and lack of technical evidence from the Forensic Science Laboratory. Applying the benefit of doubt principle fundamental to criminal jurisprudence, the court ordered the accused's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case