Govt. of Gujarat vs arjanbhai govabhai bambhaniya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1208/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016732025
Filing Number
1208/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
1208/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
990
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.arjanbhai govabhai bambhaniya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Arjanbhai Govabhai Bambhaniya, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor on 28/11/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient witness testimony from independent panchas (witnesses) and lack of technical evidence from the Forensic Science Laboratory. Applying the benefit of doubt principle fundamental to criminal jurisprudence, the court ordered the accused's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1208/2025
Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Arjanbhai Govabhai Bambhaniya, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor on 28/11/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient witness testimony from independent panchas (witnesses) and lack of technical evidence from the Forensic Science Laboratory. Applying the benefit of doubt principle fundamental to criminal jurisprudence, the court ordered the accused's acquittal and release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts