Govt. of Gujarat vs ratanben w o arashibhai vaja Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1195/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016602025

Filing Number

1195/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

1195/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

948

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ratanben w o arashibhai vaja Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted accused Ratnaben (wife of Arshibhai Raja) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A). The prosecution alleged she illegally possessed 0.2 liters of alcoholic liquor on November 16, 2025. The court found the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that key panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, proper technical evidence was absent, and the seizure procedure lacked sufficient neutral witnesses, therefore acquitting her on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1195/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted accused Ratnaben (wife of Arshibhai Raja) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A). The prosecution alleged she illegally possessed 0.2 liters of alcoholic liquor on November 16, 2025. The court found the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that key panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, proper technical evidence was absent, and the seizure procedure lacked sufficient neutral witnesses, therefore acquitting her on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case