Govt. of Gujarat vs REKHABEN W O KANABHAI MERVAD Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1194/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016592025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1194/2025

Filing Date

09-12-2025

Registration No

1194/2025

Registration Date

09-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

988

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

REKHABEN W O KANABHAI MERVAD Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sutrapar First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court acquitted the accused, Rekhabai (wife of Kanabhai Merpad), of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court noted that key witnesses (panchas/neutral observers) did not adequately corroborate the seizure of prohibited alcohol from the accused's possession on 27 November 2024, and the investigation procedure appeared questionable. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt in criminal jurisprudence, the court discharged the accused and ordered destruction of the seized contraband after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sutrapar First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court acquitted the accused, Rekhabai (wife of Kanabhai Merpad), of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court noted that key witnesses (panchas/neutral observers) did not adequately corroborate the seizure of prohibited alcohol from the accused's possession on 27 November 2024, and the investigation procedure appeared questionable. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt in criminal jurisprudence, the court discharged the accused and ordered destruction of the seized contraband after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case