Govt. of Gujarat vs RAVINABEN W O RAKESHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1193/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016582025
Filing Number
1193/2025
Filing Date
09-Dec-2025
Registration No
1193/2025
Registration Date
09-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
987
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAVINABEN W O RAKESHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused Ravinaabben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidential gaps: the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's case, proper procedure was not followed during seizure, and the link between the prohibited articles and the accused was not established. Applying precedents from Gujarat High Court judgments, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1193/2025
Summary The court acquitted the accused Ravinaabben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidential gaps: the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's case, proper procedure was not followed during seizure, and the link between the prohibited articles and the accused was not established. Applying precedents from Gujarat High Court judgments, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts