Govt. of Gujarat vs KANCHANBEN W O VIJAYBHAI KHIMABHAI PARMAR Advocate - A R BARAD — 1191/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016562025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1191/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
1191/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
851
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KANCHANBEN W O VIJAYBHAI KHIMABHAI PARMAR Advocate - A R BARAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Sutrapauda Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Kanchanben (alcohol possession case) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient evidence, lack of proper witness corroboration, and procedural irregularities in the investigation, thereby granting the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Sutrapauda Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Kanchanben (alcohol possession case) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient evidence, lack of proper witness corroboration, and procedural irregularities in the investigation, thereby granting the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts