Govt. of Gujarat vs devabhai mearamanbhai parmar Advocate - M R RATHOD — 1186/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016512025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1186/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
1186/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
904
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
devabhai mearamanbhai parmar Advocate - M R RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sutrapar Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Devabhaji Meramnbhaji Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the prosecution's witnesses (panchas/formal witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure of the alleged prohibited alcohol from the accused's possession, and noted significant procedural irregularities in the investigation, resulting in the acquittal and discharge of the accused with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sutrapar Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Devabhaji Meramnbhaji Parmar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), finding the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the prosecution's witnesses (panchas/formal witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure of the alleged prohibited alcohol from the accused's possession, and noted significant procedural irregularities in the investigation, resulting in the acquittal and discharge of the accused with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts