Govt. of Gujarat vs GAUTAMBHAI KARSANBHAI CHUDASMA Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1183/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),98(2),99,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016482025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1183/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
1183/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186006240701
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GAUTAMBHAI KARSANBHAI CHUDASMA Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused, Gautamabhai Karshanbhai Chudasama, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(AA), 98(2), 99, 81), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure of prohibited liquor and mobile phones, and the investigation procedure was questionable, lacking proper technical evidence and establishing no direct link between the accused and the recovered contraband items. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused, Gautamabhai Karshanbhai Chudasama, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(AA), 98(2), 99, 81), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure of prohibited liquor and mobile phones, and the investigation procedure was questionable, lacking proper technical evidence and establishing no direct link between the accused and the recovered contraband items. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts