Govt. of Gujarat vs dhaniben w o bhaveshbhai vaghela Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1181/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016462025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1181/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
1181/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
958
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
dhaniben w o bhaveshbhai vaghela Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted the accused Dhaniben under Section 67(AA) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panch witnesses did not corroborate the seizure of prohibited alcohol from the accused's possession, and insufficient evidence linked the contraband directly to the accused. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal jurisprudence, the court ruled there was no prospect of conviction and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted the accused Dhaniben under Section 67(AA) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panch witnesses did not corroborate the seizure of prohibited alcohol from the accused's possession, and insufficient evidence linked the contraband directly to the accused. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal jurisprudence, the court ruled there was no prospect of conviction and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts