Govt. of Gujarat vs RANJANBEN URFE SAJJAN W O PRAKASHABHAI MANAJIBHAI CHADAMIYA Advocate - M R RATHOD — 1176/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa65f. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016412025

Filing Number

1176/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

1176/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

666

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa65f

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJANBEN URFE SAJJAN W O PRAKASHABHAI MANAJIBHAI CHADAMIYA Advocate - M R RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Ranjanbhen (alias Sajjan) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 61(a) and 61(f), finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately support the seizure of prohibited liquor from the accused's possession, and proper procedure and corroboration were absent. The accused was acquitted and released, benefiting from the principle of benefit of doubt in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1176/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Ranjanbhen (alias Sajjan) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 61(a) and 61(f), finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately support the seizure of prohibited liquor from the accused's possession, and proper procedure and corroboration were absent. The accused was acquitted and released, benefiting from the principle of benefit of doubt in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case