Govt. of Gujarat vs ratanben w o nareshabhai jentibhai solanki Advocate - K J VADHER — 1175/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016402025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1175/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

1175/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

931

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

ratanben w o nareshabhai jentibhai solanki Advocate - K J VADHER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted the defendant Ratnaben in a case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A). The court found that despite the prosecution's allegation of illegal alcohol possession, the panchas (witnesses) did not properly corroborate the seizure, and crucial evidence from FSL reports and proper witness testimony was absent. Applying precedents emphasizing the need for conviction beyond reasonable doubt, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused and acquitted her, ordering release of seized contraband as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted the defendant Ratnaben in a case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A). The court found that despite the prosecution's allegation of illegal alcohol possession, the panchas (witnesses) did not properly corroborate the seizure, and crucial evidence from FSL reports and proper witness testimony was absent. Applying precedents emphasizing the need for conviction beyond reasonable doubt, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused and acquitted her, ordering release of seized contraband as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case