Govt. of Gujarat vs ratanben w o nareshabhai jentibhai solanki Advocate - K J VADHER — 1175/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016402025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1175/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
1175/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
931
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
ratanben w o nareshabhai jentibhai solanki Advocate - K J VADHER
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted the defendant Ratnaben in a case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A). The court found that despite the prosecution's allegation of illegal alcohol possession, the panchas (witnesses) did not properly corroborate the seizure, and crucial evidence from FSL reports and proper witness testimony was absent. Applying precedents emphasizing the need for conviction beyond reasonable doubt, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused and acquitted her, ordering release of seized contraband as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted the defendant Ratnaben in a case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A). The court found that despite the prosecution's allegation of illegal alcohol possession, the panchas (witnesses) did not properly corroborate the seizure, and crucial evidence from FSL reports and proper witness testimony was absent. Applying precedents emphasizing the need for conviction beyond reasonable doubt, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused and acquitted her, ordering release of seized contraband as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts